Hi, guys.... been a while since I've visited. If you don't recall, I totaled my Valk hitting a deer about a year ago
http://www.valkyrieforum.com/bbs/index.php/topic,81242.msg799196.html#msg799196Here's the newspaper article on it if you're interested:
http://www.ironcountytoday.com/view/full_story/26953281/article-Local-motorcyclist-preaches-bike-safety-following-horrific-accident?Anyway, I'm up and jogging (slow) again, got a WONDERFUL dog to help me recover (Australian Blue Heeler from the local Rescue.. but he rescued me...) AND I'm riding again, this time on my fore mentioned 2011 Triumph Rocket Roadster (pretty modified).
Thought you'd be interested in some thoughts, besides the "please wear all your gear all the time" message.. oh, and "Don't hit stupid deer"....
Here's some pics of the lady, fully modified with pipes, header (much of my own making), bars (difficult to do), shocks, tune (difficult to do), smog gut, airbox gut, bla-bla....


So, compared to the Valk.. hmmm... 4000 miles on the Rocket, so I guess I know her.
Anything to do with power = no brainer... Rocket, which, with my mods is pulling 160/160 at the rear wheel.. no comparison.
Handling = Valk.... maybe it's the tires and I've heard that a lot, but this is a beast of a bike and the Valk rolled over so easy... I'm about through with these tires (in only 4000 miles too) so new tires will tell... but I'm thinking Valk.
Riding comfort = Valk.. course my valk had a mustang seat which was awesome, but your feet were more underneath you, more upright (even though the Roadster is more upright than previous models of the Rocket, it still isn't enough.. you can't stand while riding without doing a pull-up).
fuel economy = Rocket.. even riding HARD, like 90mph for two hours I still get 33mpg.. if I slow down to 75, I get 40mpg +... my Valk at 95 would easily be at 25mpg and I never saw 40...
Smooth.. duh... Valk... but the Rocket ain't bad for 2300CC...
Engine heat = stock, about the same except the Rocket cooks your right foot/leg and the Valk cooked both evenly.. with my header on? It's almost unbearable in 90+ weather.. I need a shield on it for sure.
Modability = as far as modding the engine? Rocket.. modding the body? Valk... one PITA is that the Rocket is predominantly loved by Aussies and Germans and Brits.. mostly Ausies, so getting the stuff to mod the bike comes from half way around the world... not true of the Valk. Another thing is Triumph worked very hard to make sure their bike could not be modded with harley parts, where the Valk can (bars and risers).. I had to have my top triple tree welded and machined to 3.5" riser spacing so I could put harley bars on (double TT bars) and then I had to invent my own instrument bracket too.. double TT's went right on the Valk... anyway.
Fuel capacity and range = Rocket.
curb side appeal.. well, for the general audience and with my custom paint job on the Valk, the Valk.. but, anyone remotely interested in engines - Rocket.. AND where the Valk got the ol' nose turn-up from the harley crowd (easy to do) once they saw the boxer goldwing motor, not true with the Trumpet.. Harley guys suffer from Displacement-itis.... they just can't stand not having the biggest jugs around and 140 Cubic Inches puts a pretty big thump on the ol' 110...... but, I'd ride with Goldwingers any day over.. well, that's another topic.
Hey, just wanted to say that I miss this group. there's some good guys on the rocket board for sure, but the OVERALL membership is not the same as here... grey hair and kindred spirits I guess...
I just wish the Valk could get more oomph.... it'd be the schziizle...
Keep 'em upright boys... no deer.
John