Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
November 19, 2025, 04:27:27 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
MarkT Exhaust
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: The Number That Democrats Don’t Want You To Know: 1,030  (Read 954 times)
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13659


South Jersey


« on: December 26, 2016, 03:13:30 PM »

http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/the-number-that-democrats-dont-want-you-to-know-1030?utm_source=CT&utm_medium=CT&utm_campaign=CT

In the last eight years under Barack Obama, more than 1,000 elected seats have switched to Republicans – the largest political loss under one president in decades.

The number is actually 1,030 according to The Daily Mail. All spots in Congress, state legislatures and governor’s mansions lost by Democrats just during Obama’s presidency.

This from a president who claimed to be a “grassroots community organizer.”

    “What’s happened on the ground is that voters have been punishing Democrats for eight solid years — it’s been exhausting,” South Carolina state Senator Vincent Sheheen told the paper. He lost two gubernatorial campaigns to Nikki Haley, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for ambassador to the UN. “If I was talking about a local or state issue, voters would always lapse back into a national topic: Barack Obama.”

Leftists heralded the election of Barack Obama as a new era in liberal domination of American politics. Minorities, young people and other “disenfranchised” voters would flock to the polls and take over the country. But quite the opposite has happened.

As it stands, Democrats now control the governorship and both legislative chambers in just five states: Oregon, California, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Delaware. Republicans on the other hand, have complete control in 25 states, giving them a trifecta in half the country.
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Bighead
Member
*****
Posts: 8654


Madison Alabama


« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2016, 04:35:14 PM »

I wonder why?     NOT 2funny
Logged

1997 Bumble Bee
1999 Interstate (sold)
2016 Wing
f6john
Member
*****
Posts: 9735


Christ first and always

Richmond, Kentucky


« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2016, 05:57:38 PM »

And Obama has made his belief public that had he been able to run again, he would have won. I would have been afraid to bet against him.
Logged
Pete
Member
*****
Posts: 2673


Frasier in Southeast Tennessee


« Reply #3 on: December 26, 2016, 06:00:25 PM »

Aw, what a shame.
You mean actions have consequences.
I am shocked, shocked I say.

I expect them to keep going in the same direction and if the conservatives and constitutionist help we could seen the end of the Dimocrat part as we know it.

Aw, what a shame.
Logged
Bighead
Member
*****
Posts: 8654


Madison Alabama


« Reply #4 on: December 26, 2016, 06:08:17 PM »

Aw, what a shame.
You mean actions have consequences.
I am shocked, shocked I say.

I expect them to keep going in the same direction and if the conservatives and constitutionist help we could seen the end of the Dimocrat part as we know it.

Aw, what a shame.
Huh?
Logged

1997 Bumble Bee
1999 Interstate (sold)
2016 Wing
Rams
Member
*****
Posts: 16684


So many colors to choose from yet so few stand out

Covington, TN


« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2016, 07:21:44 PM »

While I'm definitely not an Obama fan, his election was due to bringing several minority groups together and bringing with them, the liberal vote from middle America.   He did it twice.   Nothing to be laughed at.   I honestly don't believe Obama could beat Trump if he could run again but that is just my opinion.    We've seen where he wanted to take us and that has been soundly rejected.

The pendulum will eventually swing back the other direction, let's just hope it's not so far left.    Hard to say whether or not Trump will run for a second term but, I believe Pence will follow up with a run.   It really depends on how effective the Republicans are at bring the country back, bringing jobs back and putting those swept aside back to being listened to.   It also depends on who the Dems put up to run.   So far, they haven't shown to have learned much IMHO.   They put Pelosi back into a leadership position,   I personally don't think Schummer can pull it off but, I could be wrong.  

I don't expect Trump to deliver everything he promised but, I do expect some major changes in how this country is run.    I expect SCOTUS to be taken out of the law making business and put back on track to adhere to the powers they were given by the Constitution.    I expect those who don't pull their own weight to suffer the consequences.    I also expect some painful times ahead while the new leadership attempts to right the ship and put us back on course.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2016, 08:34:34 AM by Rams » Logged

VRCC# 29981
Learning the majority of life's lessons the hard way.

Every trip is an adventure, enjoy it while it lasts.
Pappy!
Member
*****
Posts: 5710


Central Florida - Eustis


« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2016, 07:12:23 AM »

I think the fabric of this country is so fed up with Obummers crap that he would have lost just as bad as the Hildabeast did.
We kicked his sorry ass to the curb in this election.
Logged
Wizzard
Member
*****
Posts: 4043


Bald River Falls

Valparaiso IN


« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2016, 07:50:31 AM »

I think its totally his narcissistic attitude that PO's me. He is so full of himself that he thinks he is above everyone.
In his mind he is one of the greatest POTUS in history.
Logged


VRCC # 24157
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2016, 07:59:33 AM »

I think its totally his narcissistic attitude that PO's me. He is so full of himself that he thinks he is above everyone.
In his mind he is one of the greatest POTUS in history.
I don't know if he does or not. But I think most politicians that aspire to the highest levels have pretty big egos.
Logged
Wizzard
Member
*****
Posts: 4043


Bald River Falls

Valparaiso IN


« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2016, 08:02:18 AM »

I think its totally his narcissistic attitude that PO's me. He is so full of himself that he thinks he is above everyone.
In his mind he is one of the greatest POTUS in history.
I don't know if he does or not. But I think most politicians that aspire to the highest levels have pretty big egos.
Probably very true,, but some are more verbal about expressing how good they are. Some may feel that way but not express it. Which one you suppose he is?
Logged


VRCC # 24157
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #10 on: December 27, 2016, 08:13:54 AM »

I think its totally his narcissistic attitude that PO's me. He is so full of himself that he thinks he is above everyone.
In his mind he is one of the greatest POTUS in history.
I don't know if he does or not. But I think most politicians that aspire to the highest levels have pretty big egos.
Probably very true,, but some are more verbal about expressing how good they are. Some may feel that way but not express it. Which one you suppose he is?
I don't imagine you will agree, but I think this was kind of out of character for him. I think disregarding his politics, he has been pretty gracious most of the time.
Logged
baldo
Member
*****
Posts: 6961


Youbetcha

Cape Cod, MA


« Reply #11 on: December 27, 2016, 08:55:45 AM »

I think its totally his narcissistic attitude that PO's me. He is so full of himself that he thinks he is above everyone.
In his mind he is one of the greatest POTUS in history.

Go easy on the guy. He hasn't even been sworn in yet......
Logged

98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13659


South Jersey


« Reply #12 on: December 27, 2016, 09:12:06 AM »

interesting read and background

http://freedomoutpost.com/obama-was-hand-picked-not-a-natural-born-citizen-congress-knew-it-protected-him/

Below is a lengthy excerpt from "Article II Facts" hosted on the site of the Article II Political Action Committee. If you like what you read, I would encourage you to consider a donation to their cause.

Let's take a trip back through recent history:

Attempts to redefine or amend Article II "natural born Citizen" Clause of the U.S. Constitution:

The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment under H.J.R. 33: which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – "Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen."

Bingham's first attempt failed and he resurrected H.J.R. 33: in 1977 under H.J.R. 38:, again failing to gain support from members of congress. Bingham was a Yale Law grad and member of the secret society Skull and Bones, later a lecturer at Columbia Law and thick as thieves with the United Nations via his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations.

Bingham's work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (Cool attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…

1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59: in the 108th Congress – "Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President." – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].

2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67: – "Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President." – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]

3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128: – "Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term "natural born citizen," to establish eligibility for the Office of President" – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]

4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104: – "Constitutional Amendment – "Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office."  – No co-sponsors.

5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2: to the 109th Congress – "Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President." – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]

6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 inH.J.R. 15: – "Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office." – No Co-Sponsor

7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42: – "Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and whos has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President." – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]

8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678: on February 28, 2008 – "Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term "natural born Citizen" in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces." – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)

From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (Cool different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee — All of it taking placing during Barack Obama's rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election.

In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.

Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511: – declaring Sen. John McCain a "natural born citizen" eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO]

S.R.511 States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a "natural born Citizen" under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. S.R511passed by a 99-0 unanimous consent of the Senate, with only John McCain not voting. The basis was – "Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens;" – a condition not met by Barack Hussein Obama II. – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT]; Sen Webb, Jim [VA]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (They had made certain that John McCain would run against Barack Obama)

However, in the McCain resolution is also this language – "Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen' of the United States; – Whereas the term `natural born Citizen', as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;"

The U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. The definition of "is" is not in the constitution either. Yet this is the text that would later be issued in Congressional Research Service talking points memos distributed to members of congress, to protect an individual that all members of congress know and understand to be an "unconstitutional" resident of the people's White House – Barack Hussein Obama II.

Once again, as the political left was unable to alter the U.S. Constitution by way of legitimate constitutional process, they resorted to altering the constitution via precedent setting, in short, knowingly electing and getting away with seating an unconstitutional president in order to alter Article II requirements for the office via breaking those constitutional requirements.

The press would not ask any questions and the American people were already too ill-informed of their constitution to know or too distracted by daily life to care. The press would provide the cover, swearing to the lies of an unconstitutional administration put in power by criminal actors focused only on their lofty political agenda of forever altering the American form of government.

The people would be caught up in a steady diet of daily assaults on their individual freedom and liberty and overlook the most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president. [SOURCE CREDIT]

There you have it. Make of this what you will.

It brings about many questions for me.

Would people like Claire McCaskill and Hillary Clinton really come to John McCain's aid if they did not have an ulterior motive?

Why were people like Inhofe, Issa, and Rohrabacher either sponsoring or co-sponsoring these pieces of legislation? After all, these men have been three of Obama's biggest critics. We have heard lots of threats and promises from them but have seen no results. Could it be that these men are just more shining examples of "all bark and no bite"? (See Definition of "Smoke and Mirrors")
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Alpha Dog
Member
*****
Posts: 1557


Arcanum, OH


« Reply #13 on: December 27, 2016, 09:22:51 AM »

I think George Washington, Abe Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, could have smoked them both.  Too bad they were not on the ticket.
Logged
Wizzard
Member
*****
Posts: 4043


Bald River Falls

Valparaiso IN


« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2016, 09:31:17 AM »

I think George Washington, Abe Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, could have smoked them both.  Too bad they were not on the ticket.

Actually I think Mike Pence could have smoked them both.
Logged


VRCC # 24157
F6Dave
Member
*****
Posts: 2318



« Reply #15 on: December 27, 2016, 10:42:24 AM »

I thought Jess from VA summed up the reason pretty well in his post last month:

Open the borders to any and all illegals, transport them in secret to various states and let them loose, stop enforcement of existing immigration laws and procedures, catch and release convicted felons.  Make a vast social experiment of the US military, and gut it.  Spend vast sums of money on alternative energy, and have billions simply disappear with no results, then never go after anyone for outright fraud.  Have a foreign policy no one can understand, and cause all our allies to wonder what the hell we are doing.  Attempt to join the globalization (one-world govt) program, endorse treaties and other programs destined to give away large segments of national sovereignty (in violation of the constitution) to the UN.  Introduce a socialised form of heath care insurance law backed by lies and falsehoods that is entirely unworkable, ruins healthcare, reaches into every aspect of our lives, and results in a trillion dollar unfixable mess. Allow (encourage) vast Fed agency regulators to run amok, with books of new regs that collectively served to hamstring American business and energy production in a completely non-democratic fashion.  Disregard all argument against 10 percent ethanol, and announce that 15 percent ethanol was coming even though NO one wants it.  And always raise taxes, no matter what (because all our policies cost vast amounts of money, and we know how to spend it better than you who earned it do).  And much more. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: