Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
June 21, 2025, 08:50:16 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
Inzane 25
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Send this topic Print
Author Topic: New Diesel Oil spec CK-4 not good for motorcycles if also meets SN and SM.  (Read 4096 times)
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13448


South Jersey


« on: August 26, 2017, 02:59:50 PM »

This new spec requires below 1000ppm of phosphorus and zinc if the oil also is to meet SN and SM gasoline engine specs. Levels this low will wipe out the cams and rocker arms. Ford has already come against this spec citing excessive wear in powerstroke engines.
http://fordauthority.com/2017/03/ford-launches-new-oil-spec-for-6-7l-power-stroke-diesel/
So far Motorcraft oils have a new Ford specific spec which has higher levels, and early testing shows rotella is maintaining the higher levels and is rated CK-4 but not SN and SM.
All Delos are below the 1000ppm level.
Present CJ-4 spec oils which are above 1000ppm are being phased out. So stock up.
So make sure to check your oil of choice in regards to this new spec.

This site does virgin oil analysis of oils and is starting to post the CK-4 oils.
http://pqiamerica.com/HDEO_Sample_Summary_Dec_2016.html
« Last Edit: December 31, 2017, 06:20:15 PM by Vaquero (aka 98valk & CA) » Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
OnaWingandaPrayer
Member
*****
Posts: 591


« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2017, 04:49:15 PM »

They always have to be messing with good products Sad
Logged
Bagger John - #3785
Member
*****
Posts: 1952



« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2017, 06:13:45 AM »

Is this going to affect motorcycle-specific formulations - or just oils intended for use in diesel engines?
Logged
DeathWishBikerDude
Member
*****
Posts: 464


« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2017, 07:59:59 AM »

I've used super tech full synthetic from wally world since new.You can eat off the valve train,no noticeable wear.$17 a gallon.
Logged
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13448


South Jersey


« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2017, 03:33:36 AM »

Is this going to affect motorcycle-specific formulations - or just oils intended for use in diesel engines?

This is just a New Diesel Oil spec. No other oils are affected.
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13448


South Jersey


« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2017, 03:41:02 AM »

The diesel oils which will have low phos and lower zinc levels will also meet the auto specs SN, SM and SL.
If the new diesel oil does not it will still have the higher phos and zinc levels.  
So far Delvac and Delo will meet the auto specs also, so no good for motorcycles.

Rotella and Motorcraft will only meet the CK-4 spec and maintain PPM over 1k for phos and zinc (I'm sure there are others), plus they will also have high levels of Boron to meet the spec, which is a great anti-wear additive.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2017, 04:31:15 AM by Vaquero (aka 98valk & CA) » Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Hooter
Member
*****
Posts: 4092

S.W. Michigan


« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2017, 04:19:37 AM »

I use Rotella T 15 x 40 in all my bikes. Never an issue.
Logged

You are never lost if you don't care where you are!
JC19
Member
*****
Posts: 51


Rush City, Minnesota


« Reply #7 on: September 01, 2017, 03:50:41 PM »

Just so I have this straight, I just bought a gallon of Rotella T6. Specs say CK4 and CJ4. Should I not use it then?
Logged
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13448


South Jersey


« Reply #8 on: September 01, 2017, 04:12:51 PM »

Just so I have this straight, I just bought a gallon of Rotella T6. Specs say CK4 and CJ4. Should I not use it then?

the auto specs are what reduces the phosphorus and zinc. if no auto specs it is good to use and actually better than the old CJ-4 spec, mainly because of the high levels of boron which has to be used to meet the CK-4 spec.
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Send this topic Print
Jump to: