Keeping an eye on the ball

[f6john]

  Is anyone else trying to keep up with the Russian revelations about who was paying who and when and why and where? I just found out that when Democrats pay Russians for damaging info on Trump it's not collusion its opposition research. Those Democrats sure are a crafty bunch. You couldn't make this stuff up or could you?

   Putin has to be laughing his ass off, I imagine.

  I'm not pointing fingers as it's hard to know what to believe as truth. Being a politician in Washington must be like driving a black car down a gravel road any expecting it to not be dusty when you arrive at your destination.

[Bighead]

Yeah Russians are only bad when The Demi's say so. No proof LR anything else and they won't let go.d

[Robert]

Hume: Tide May Be Turning in Russia Story & Not in a Way Dems Like

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe into Russian meddling in the U.S. reportedly now includes the Democrat-leaning lobbying firm the Podesta Group, which is headed by Tony Podesta, brother of Hillary Clinton's former campaign manager, John Podesta.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/10/25/brit-hume-russia-collusion-investigations-tide-turning-democrats

[..]

http://www.valkyrieforum.com/bbs/index.php/topic,97876.0.html

[phideux]

Yeah, I still don't get it. HRC gave away 20% of our Uranium to the Russians, shortly after that the Russians donate 147 million bucks to the Clinton Foundation, plus a bunch of Stupidly high paying speaking gigs open up in Russia for Billy Boy.
On top of all that, the Clintons got their tax break for their charitable donations, they donated over a miilion ucks to the Clinton Foundation. That noble foundation that spent over 150 million bucks in salaries and administrative costs to distribute just a little over 5 million bucks. Nice.
They should all be buried under the jail.

[Patrick]

A crafty bunch ? LOL. I can think of a number of other names for them, I know you were trying to be polite. 

I'm thinking that finally things will start to coming crashing down around them.  I think the Clintons and their buddies would look good in striped government issued clothes.

[G-Man]

I heard that Mueller was heading up the FBI and knew all about the uranium deal.  So how can he investigate himself?  Do we now need a special counsel for the special counsel? And will all this now take a year to investigate?  

And the dossier thingy, wow.  The DNC is as corrupt as it gets.  

And Boss Tweed pants suit is still blaming the other side for attacking her unfairly.  

[Rams]

Ah, come on guys.   Remember, the Clintons left the White House penniless per HRC.

[f6john]

It's fun to watch the democratic talking heads trying to explain away all of their connections to the very things they accused Trump of doing. It's also very revealing of these people's character and thought processes. Fox is having a hay day going back to the first of the year showing clips of Dems condemning Trump over this dossier and now finding out it was a hatchet job paid for by the the Dems.

I "assume" that there are some decent Democrats in our Congress, I'm waiting for one of them to comment but I'm not holding my breath.

[Gavin_Sons]

I'm waiting for the Dems here to comment and try to defend this one. They are awfully quiet. 

[northernvalk]

Chirp...chirp...chirp.........crickets......

[Tx Bohemian]

I'm waiting for the Dems here to comment and try to defend this one. They are awfully quiet. 

It'll be called "Republican diversion"!

In the morning before work I try to watch a few news shows and get a "rounded view" of what's happening.

This is what the "left leaning" shows are calling it.

[JimC]

Here is what bothers me about our modern day bank robbers.

Has anyone else noticed how none of these things become known to the public until the statute of limitations on charging has already expired ?  The movie Clinton Cash has been out for a couple of years, that means that the research into it was done years before that, yet there is no mention of collusion until now?

I have never been a conspiracy theory type, but it sure seems convenient, and it makes me think that both sides of the swamp are working toward "one world order". How else can anyone explain Trump having such a hard time within his own party?

WE NEED TERM LIMITS !

Jim

[Mobile Mayor]

Term limits, at face value, may seem to be a good idea.  But what about when one who is elected speaks the truth, and backs it with facts?  If that  representative becomes a thorn in the side of the NWO, and has been convincing, to the point that others are listening, what happens when the candidate can no longer hold office?  Does the pendulum bounce off of the wall and become inert?  Beware of the double edged sword.

[Willow]

I don't believe term limits would solve the real problem.

Our real issue is a loyalty to party affiliation that supersedes an elected official's commitment to serve the best interest of the nation.  I don't see a realistic way to do away with the established political parties.  Maybe the nations that have four or more political parties have a better chance at truly exercising democracy.

[JimC]

I don't believe term limits would solve the real problem.

Term limits, at face value, may seem to be a good idea.  But what about when one who is elected speaks the truth, and backs it with facts? 

I see where you are coming from, but looking at it from my perspective, term limits would help (I said help) eliminate the special interest groups and lobbyists from getting embedded in the system. I believe that limits would force politicians to vote the way their constituents want to be represented.

The system we have now elects the most charismatic or polished individual, or the one with the most money to spend. Let's face it, our current system elects people of average or a little above average means and makes them millionaires. One term could (COULD) possibly curb that. Yes, it could backfire, but I think it is worth the gamble.

Jim

[..]

Here's another shoe that dropped

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5045377/Trump-Justice-Dept-investigate-claim-Hillary-took-DNC.html

[G-Man]

They're turning on Mrs. Clinton, and she still won't go away.  Every month she comes up with a new "what happened".

This one is funny, though.  The "journalist" that gave Mrs. Clinton the debate question before hand, wrote a book in which she says the Clintons took over the DNC and did some shady things to steal the nomination away from Bernie and that while at CNN she colluded with the campaign.

https://www.snopes.com/donna-brazile-leaves-cnn/