Question lingers in my mind

[Wizzard]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

[Psychotic Bovine]

Well, she did hire Avenatti.

[baldo]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's a quote from her testimony.....

"In a sworn declaration, Swetnick — a Washington, D.C., resident — said she was a "victim of one of these 'gang' or 'train' rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present" at a party in D.C. in approximately 1982."

The devil's in the details.....

[MAD6Gun]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's a quote from her testimony.....

"In a sworn declaration, Swetnick — a Washington, D.C., resident — said she was a "victim of one of these 'gang' or 'train' rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present" at a party in D.C. in approximately 1982."

The devil's in the details.....

Well that's it Baldo is right lets lock em both up. Throw away the keys. No trial after all this is the court of public opinion and that is all that matters right?

What freeking details. 35 years after.  She picked two names to put in her story. Just because it is sworn doesn't make it true now does it?  

[Psychotic Bovine]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's a quote from her testimony.....

"In a sworn declaration, Swetnick — a Washington, D.C., resident — said she was a "victim of one of these 'gang' or 'train' rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present" at a party in D.C. in approximately 1982."

The devil's in the details.....

From the New York Times:
The allegation came from Julie Swetnick, 55, who like Judge Kavanaugh, 53, grew up in the Washington suburbs. In a statement posted on Twitter by her lawyer, Ms. Swetnick said she observed the future Supreme Court nominee at parties where women were verbally abused, inappropriately touched, made "disoriented" with alcohol or drugs and "gang raped."

She said she witnessed Judge Kavanaugh participating in some of the misconduct, including lining up outside a bedroom where "numerous boys" were "waiting for their 'turn' with a girl inside the room." Ms. Swetnick said she was raped at one of the parties, and she believed she had been drugged.

None of Ms. Swetnick's claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.

So, the question is, if she was raped at one of these parties, was it the first one, or the tenth party?
If the first, why did she still go to 9 more of them?  If the 10th, why did she even attend 9 previous when there was all of this gang raping/drugging/boozing going on?

[Wizzard]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's a quote from her testimony.....

"In a sworn declaration, Swetnick — a Washington, D.C., resident — said she was a "victim of one of these 'gang' or 'train' rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present" at a party in D.C. in approximately 1982."

The devil's in the details.....

From the New York Times:
The allegation came from Julie Swetnick, 55, who like Judge Kavanaugh, 53, grew up in the Washington suburbs. In a statement posted on Twitter by her lawyer, Ms. Swetnick said she observed the future Supreme Court nominee at parties where women were verbally abused, inappropriately touched, made "disoriented" with alcohol or drugs and "gang raped."

She said she witnessed Judge Kavanaugh participating in some of the misconduct, including lining up outside a bedroom where "numerous boys" were "waiting for their 'turn' with a girl inside the room." Ms. Swetnick said she was raped at one of the parties, and she believed she had been drugged.

None of Ms. Swetnick's claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.

So, the question is, if she was raped at one of these parties, was it the first one, or the tenth party?
If the first, why did she still go to 9 more of them?  If the 10th, why did she even attend 9 previous when there was all of this gang raping/drugging/boozing going on?

Exactly and if you do the math,, she was an adult partying with teens. So now if one was only "present" at the party and you got raped anyone that was present is guilty? WTH kind of law is that?

[Jersey mike]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's a quote from her testimony.....

"In a sworn declaration, Swetnick — a Washington, D.C., resident — said she was a "victim of one of these 'gang' or 'train' rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present" at a party in D.C. in approximately 1982."

The devil's in the details.....

Well that's it Baldo is right lets lock em both up. Throw away the keys. No trial after all this is the court of public opinion and that is all that matters right?

What freeking details. 35 years after.  She picked two names to put in her story.


Just because it is sworn doesn't make it true now does it?  

That depends on which side of the aisle you're on.

I don't know how a person would stay quite about this for all these years, especially after he became a judge.

This is oh so similar to the Clarence Thomas hearings which I remember watching.

This is all based on delay and stall. Drag his name through the mud and throw as much crap around to,see if it sticks somewhere. I feel bad for Kavanaugh and his family. I don't believe any of these women, I never believed Anita Hill either. To be honest the main thing I remember from those hearings is the pubic hair on a Coke can ordeal.

[Wizzard]

Pretty soon we will be guilty if our neighbor gets raped and we live next door and she brings it up 30 years from now.

[Psychotic Bovine]

Also, what does that say about Julie Swetnick's character?  She saw numerous girls being drugged and raped, at numerous parties, AND SHE NEVER REPORTED IT TO THE POLICE?  She, who holds all of these clearances with the government, and she readily admits she stood by as girls were being drugged and raped.  SHE COULD HAVE SAVED THEM!

[Moonshot_1]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's a quote from her testimony.....

"In a sworn declaration, Swetnick — a Washington, D.C., resident — said she was a "victim of one of these 'gang' or 'train' rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present" at a party in D.C. in approximately 1982."

The devil's in the details.....

From the New York Times:
The allegation came from Julie Swetnick, 55, who like Judge Kavanaugh, 53, grew up in the Washington suburbs. In a statement posted on Twitter by her lawyer, Ms. Swetnick said she observed the future Supreme Court nominee at parties where women were verbally abused, inappropriately touched, made "disoriented" with alcohol or drugs and "gang raped."

She said she witnessed Judge Kavanaugh participating in some of the misconduct, including lining up outside a bedroom where "numerous boys" were "waiting for their 'turn' with a girl inside the room." Ms. Swetnick said she was raped at one of the parties, and she believed she had been drugged.

None of Ms. Swetnick's claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.

So, the question is, if she was raped at one of these parties, was it the first one, or the tenth party?
If the first, why did she still go to 9 more of them?  If the 10th, why did she even attend 9 previous when there was all of this gang raping/drugging/boozing going on?

Exactly and if you do the math,, she was an adult partying with teens. So now if one was only "present" at the party and you got raped anyone that was present is guilty? WTH kind of law is that?

So technically, Swetnick basically raped a bunch of under aged teen aged boys. Pretty much her story when you factor in she was the adult. If you do the math. She was, and maybe still is, a serial rapist.

[Bighead]

Just another POS lying to get things delayed.......nothing more.

[Psychotic Bovine]

Just another POS lying to get things delayed.......nothing more.

Well, that explains Avenatti and her.  Trash begets trash.

[scooperhsd]

I  would have a very simple standard for confirmation from now on -

IF something like this came up, did the accuser actually file a complaint with the local law enforcement THAT NIGHT (or even later that week), even if she later dropped it ? If a complaint was filed - it's worthy of consideration, if a complaint was not filed - it isn't.

[Wizzard]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's a quote from her testimony.....

"In a sworn declaration, Swetnick — a Washington, D.C., resident — said she was a "victim of one of these 'gang' or 'train' rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present" at a party in D.C. in approximately 1982."

The devil's in the details.....

What details,, he was "present?". What about her? She was present, so that makes her just as guilty as him? That is really efin stupid.

[old2soon]

                  While I am NOT running for any public office if I were to run for any public office and person or persons unknown delved into my behavior from say age 16 til I got married in 1969-24 easin up on 25 at that time-some of the stuff that happened then could be construed as NOT good for a person running for public office. And a LOT of that "stuff" happened in the Orient where some laws are more lax concerning "stuff" that may or may not have transpired. And I'm with the not reported then crowd then WHY in snugglin creation iz ya pitchin a bitch NOW? I Know the WHY! I sincerely hope WHOEVER is payin these gals is paying them a LOT. Isn't there also a statute of limitations involved here? In house Barristers? RIDE SAFE.

[scooperhsd]

If this keeps up, pretty soon you're not going to be able to find ANYONE decent for an appointed office ever again.

[Atl-Jerry]

                  While I am NOT running for any public office if I were to run for any public office and person or persons unknown delved into my behavior from say age 16 til I got married in 1969-24 easin up on 25 at that time-some of the stuff that happened then could be construed as NOT good for a person running for public office. And a LOT of that "stuff" happened in the Orient where some laws are more lax concerning "stuff" that may or may not have transpired. And I'm with the not reported then crowd then WHY in snugglin creation iz ya pitchin a bitch NOW? I Know the WHY! I sincerely hope WHOEVER is payin these gals is paying them a LOT. Isn't there also a statute of limitations involved here? In house Barristers? RIDE SAFE.

Hey!  Didn't I see you at The Sand Box outside the main gate at Subic Bay?????

[Fazer]

What if someone alleges he used.....the "n" word as a teenager?  Heads will explode.

[The emperor has no clothes]

                  While I am NOT running for any public office if I were to run for any public office and person or persons unknown delved into my behavior from say age 16 til I got married in 1969-24 easin up on 25 at that time-some of the stuff that happened then could be construed as NOT good for a person running for public office. And a LOT of that "stuff" happened in the Orient where some laws are more lax concerning "stuff" that may or may not have transpired. And I'm with the not reported then crowd then WHY in snugglin creation iz ya pitchin a bitch NOW? I Know the WHY! I sincerely hope WHOEVER is payin these gals is paying them a LOT. Isn't there also a statute of limitations involved here? In house Barristers? RIDE SAFE.

Hey!  Didn't I see you at The Sand Box outside the main gate at Subic Bay?????

Don't admit to anything Dennis. 

[Wizzard]

Ok,, so you are in college or high school and your girlfriend gets drunk and has sex with you willingly.
Forward 35 years and this now woman decides you are important and have money so she brings this up and says it was forced. Way I see this current case going you are guilty without due process.

[Wizzard]

Well, she did hire Avenatti.

Yeah,, another attention whore

[The emperor has no clothes]

Well, she did hire Avenatti.

Yeah,, another attention whore

He may well be an attention whore, but he has been pretty accurate in his case against Trump and Cohen.

[Serk]

What if someone alleges he used.....the "n" word as a teenager?  Heads will explode.

...unless they have the Democratic Sphere of Invulnerability...

But I think that's the idea.

[Gavin_Sons]

Well, she did hire Avenatti.

Yeah,, another attention whore

He may well be an attention whore, but he has been pretty accurate in his case against Trump and Cohen.

Accuracy is in th he eye of the beholder. Kinda like truth. 

[Jess from VA]

OK.  After her testimony tomorrow, if she shows..... vote him in.

Let the rapist dems, media, and lying accusers et al all pound sand.  (THEY are the rapists here, not the good judge). 

I really really want to watch their collective heads explode. (unfortunately, only figuratively)

Grow some balls, stand up to the plate together, and vote him in.

Quit playing their game.  All you are doing is encouraging and empowering them. 

[..]

If this keeps up, pretty soon you're not going to be able to find ANYONE decent for an appointed office ever again.

Drip, drip, drip.

Some know how to play  a very looooooong game.

[signart]

Can you imagine how dumb you would have to be if you actually was nutty enough to attend....count them....10 parties where you got trainbanged!

Not denying it happened but let's think rationally for one minute......
1) You either loved what was happening
or
2) you're dumb as a box of rocks.

So which one is it?

If you want to sound credible...let's not be carried away with our tales!
One party, one trainbang....very believable but 10?

Here's the photo released by her porn attorney after detailed accusations:

[Oss]

see any resemblance to Keith Ledger's joker?

[baldo]

see any resemblance to Keith Ledger's joker?

nope

[RP#62]

What if someone alleges he used.....the "n" word as a teenager?  Heads will explode.

...unless they have the Democratic Sphere of Invulnerability...

But I think that's the idea.

Or they were a grand dragon in the klan...oh wait.

-RP

[J.Mencalice]

To inject just a microscopic bit of simple procedural logic into this quagmire of hate and horseshit from above and below: This vote of the committee carries no weight of finality, if I have correctly read past confirmation results, i.e. it is not the end of the process. The committee either sends a positive, negative, or neutral recommendation on the nominee to the remainder of their colleagues.  It is solely a recommendation to the rest of the Senate; it is not the definitive result of many hours of questions and answers involving the confirmation process.  The nominee has to be voted on by the entire body of the United States Senate and requires a simple, up-and-down majority vote of "Yes" for the affirming members to be victorious and the nominee confirmed.
Concurrently, if there are enough Senators of that body that vote "No", then the nominee is not confirmed, the dissenting members are victorious and the nominee is dismissed with a new nominee to be considered with the process starting all over again.

There have been more than a few no hitters spoiled in the bottom of the ninth with one or two outs and two strikes on a batter.  For anyone who knows the sport to believe that anything is locked up...ever...is just plain fantasy.  Fastballs, curveballs, sliders, knuckleballs, spitters, splitters, changeups, they all get hit.
Ask Hillary.

[old2soon]

            Damn my puter ignorance BUT a gnarly old Female Army Sarge I ride with sent me a pic of the first "accuser" with-iz ya ready?-george soros. Maybe our in house N S A type-Serk-can find the photo I am alluding to? And on the "news" 2nite it was brought out that some of the allegations go back to high school? high school? In that case show me some guys that didn't grope the gals! When I went to high school if the Lady did Not appreciate being groped/fondled/man handled the groper got his face smacked HARD. And if you didn't back off or didn't get and heed the message you could very well git kneed in the nards. This whole danged shootin match stinks like a kettle of rotten fish. RIDE SAFE.

[¿spoom]

To inject just a microscopic bit of simple procedural logic into this quagmire of hate and horseshit from above and below: This vote of the committee carries no weight of finality, if I have correctly read past confirmation results, i.e. it is not the end of the process. The committee either sends a positive, negative, or neutral recommendation on the nominee to the remainder of their colleagues.  It is solely a recommendation to the rest of the Senate; it is not the definitive result of many hours of questions and answers involving the confirmation process.  The nominee has to be voted on by the entire body of the United States Senate and requires a simple, up-and-down majority vote of "Yes" for the affirming members to be victorious and the nominee confirmed.
Concurrently, if there are enough Senators of that body that vote "No", then the nominee is not confirmed, the dissenting members are victorious and the nominee is dismissed with a new nominee to be considered with the process starting all over again.

There have been more than a few no hitters spoiled in the bottom of the ninth with one or two outs and two strikes on a batter.  For anyone who knows the sport to believe that anything is locked up...ever...is just plain fantasy.  Fastballs, curveballs, sliders, knuckleballs, spitters, splitters, changeups, they all get hit.
Ask Hillary.

You are most wise. 'course even Hillary knows she'd have a better chance of having a ball hit her in the face at a baseball game than in the Oval Office   

[Wizzard]

Well, she did hire Avenatti.

Yeah,, another attention whore

He may well be an attention whore, but he has been pretty accurate in his case against Trump and Cohen.

Accuracy is in th he eye of the beholder. Kinda like truth. 

for sure, Meathead , maybe you should do some research on him, like I did.

[Wizzard]

Another question lingers!
How did Kavanaugh manage to be inappropriate with only democratic women? Inquiring minds want to know.

[FryeVRCCDS0067]

Concerning the current Supreme Court debacle.

I think the biggest thing this is showing us is how close we came to sending our country over the cliff in the last presidential election. These socialists who are defaulting to hate, violence and character assassination came close to being in power.

Imagine if you will, an America governed by the swamp for another 4 years? An America where lies, graft and disdain for our Constitution was the norm for another 4 years? An America whose Supreme Court which is supposed to interpret Constitutional law doesn't accept or believe in our Constitutional Rights or even our Constitution itself? An America where everyone that disagrees with the establishment is attacked by the IRS? An America where sending guns to Mexican cartels to help with anti-gun propaganda is acceptable? An America which puts the interests of illegals before the interests of American citizens? An America which encourages industry to move manufacturing to other countries? An American government which supports anything that hurts America and opposes anything that helps America?

We nearly became the generation that threw away the freedom our ancestors risked everything to preserve and pass to us.

We aren't out of the woods yet as this "dog and pony show" so clearly illuminates but we do still have a chance to preserve our liberty.

November's elections will largely determine what happens, do we save our country, do we continue our amazing journey of freedom, do we continue to pursue the dream of our Founders, or do we flush our liberty and our country down the drain?

[Robert]

As we go on we see less and less truth to the whole story. It will be interesting to read the comments back and see what was said.

The Dems did not do women a favor in this since now all accusations will be met with skepticism.


Report: Kavanaugh accusers Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey Ford have an interesting connection

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/09/26/report-kavanaugh-accusers-julie-swetnick-and-christine-blasey-ford-have-an-interesting-connection/

‘This is BAD’! Looks like Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers just TORPEDOED her case by releasing polygraph results [pics]

Dr. Ford's polygraph letter contradicts letter she sent to Feinstein. Polygraph letter says "4 boys and a couple of girls" were at party. Letter to Feinstein says "me and four others." No way to reconcile the two—irrespective of whether she's counting herself in polygraph letter

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2018/09/26/this-is-bad-looks-like-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers-just-torpedoed-her-case-by-releasing-polygraph-results-pics/

Ex-boyfriend filed restraining order against third Kavanaugh accuser

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/ex-boyfriend-filed-restraining-order-against-kavanaugh-accuser-845348


‘I hope you get raped’: Check out these messages left with Sen. Chuck Grassley’s staffers
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/09/26/i-hope-you-get-raped-check-out-these-messages-left-with-sen-chuck-grassleys-staffers/

Kavanaugh’s Classmates Fire Back At Avenatti-Represented Accuser
http://dailycaller.com/2018/09/26/kavanaugh-classmates-avenatti-accuser/

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-27/kavanaugh-mayhem-two-men-cop-feeling-christine-fords-breasts-contradicting-her
Kavanaugh Mayhem: Two Men Cop To Feeling Christine Ford's Breasts, Contradicting Her Accusation

[G-Man]

If this keeps up, pretty soon you're not going to be able to find ANYONE decent for an appointed office ever again.

This is why conservatives of color and the Jewish religion are few and far between.  

I was watching a comedy movie the other night.  One in which the vast majority of the cast is black.  In one scene, the main character, a black woman, is giving a toast at a party and says to the crowd that she doesn't trust a black republican.

And look what they're doing to Dershowitz.  He's not even a republican, he's just giving legal perspective and because he's providing honesty, they're hating him.

From another thread:
This will be the second Supreme Court Justice who's opinions and decisions/votes will be tainted for the rest of his tenure.  They did the same to Clarence Thomas.  They destroyed that man's reputation so much that even my daughter, who was born 3 years after his nomination hearings, believes he is guilty of what he was accused of doing, NOT proven to have done, and together with the rest of the black community, has practically shunned him.  Instead of celebrating a great man and using him as an example, they've been convinced he's an enemy to his own community.  And now they're doing it again.  But this time our law makers are off the rails.  Some are actually stating, out loud, that the accused is responsible for providing proof that he didn't do it.  Social media has already convicted him and calling him a rapist and a sex predator and now the conductor of 10 trains.  Even if/when Dr Ford falls on her face and the con-job is exposed, the vicious people who tried destroy him will just move on to the next victim, make no apologies, and face no penalties for their devious actions.

Shame on any one condoning this or defending this.  "Shouldn't she have her say?"  Please!  I say she's already had it.  Damage is already done.  As soon as the Dems exploited her and leaked her identity out there, it's been reputation destroying, delay of game tactic ever since.

[Psychotic Bovine]

As we go on we see less and less truth to the whole story. It will be interesting to read the comments back and see what was said.



Report: Kavanaugh accusers Julie Swetnick and Christine Blasey Ford have an interesting connection

https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/09/26/report-kavanaugh-accusers-julie-swetnick-and-christine-blasey-ford-have-an-interesting-connection/

'This is BAD'! Looks like Christine Blasey Ford's lawyers just TORPEDOED her case by releasing polygraph results [pics]

Dr. Ford's polygraph letter contradicts letter she sent to Feinstein. Polygraph letter says "4 boys and a couple of girls" were at party. Letter to Feinstein says "me and four others." No way to reconcile the two—irrespective of whether she's counting herself in polygraph letter

https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2018/09/26/this-is-bad-looks-like-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers-just-torpedoed-her-case-by-releasing-polygraph-results-pics/

Julie Swetnick's ex boyfriend filed a restraining order against her.  She is batsh!t crazy, apparently.
Which would explain the outrageous claims made by her.

[da prez]

  I was groped by a female running for office. Give me a name and tell me where she has been and I will be there years ago . I have a time machine and total recall. 

                                     da prez