Compassion, unity and love

[Patrick]

Yep, that needs to be our response to terrorism.

[..]

Yep, that needs to be our response to terrorism.

Faintly off in the distance one hears "You've got a friend" sung wistfully.

[baldo]

Yep, that needs to be our response to terrorism.

Wow, barely 6 AM and you're posting about terrorists....

Is that before or after morning coffee?

[The emperor has no clothes]

Yep, that needs to be our response to terrorism.

Wow, barely 6 AM and you're posting about terrorists....

Is that before or after morning coffee?

"Rust never sleeps"  (Neil Young was way ahead of his time) 

[Patrick]

Well, good. It looks as though we have our first 2 volunteers to jump up and show them the compassion, unity and love they need.  I'm thinking that the big o and lynch will make sure you're standing in front of them.

[Wizzard]

There once was a man that loved and forgave his enemies. He was way better than I will ever be.

[Valkorado]

There once was a man that loved and forgave his enemies.

(font=sarcasm) But He has returned, and his name is Barack Hussein Obama! (/font)

[Pete]

And now we all know why he picked her for AG.

[The emperor has no clothes]

There once was a man that loved and forgave his enemies.

(font=sarcasm) But He has returned, and his name is Barack Hussein Obama! (/font)

I thought Wizzard was referencing Jesus ?  You haven't finally seen the error of your ways ? 

[BF]

Maybe we can all sit around and sing kumbaya with the terrorists. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz9BNwbKM0M

[Daycruiser]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

[..]

Maybe we can all sit around and sing kumbaya with the terrorists.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz9BNwbKM0M

I'll raise you a Kerry  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuWEkUcS0lI

[Chrisj CMA]

Compassion for the families of victims

Unity against radical Muslims

Love for the knowledge of every terrorist that is killed

[baldo]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

This is a new one.....Who might they be, pray tell? 

[Patrick]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

Its interesting to look into her background and how it relates to the obamas and other obama staffers.

[baldo]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

Its interesting to look into her background and how it relates to the obamas and other obama staffers.

That's quite a teaser......how about some details?

[Patrick]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

Its interesting to look into her background and how it relates to the obamas and other obama staffers.

That's quite a teaser......how about some details?

One more time. You're not about to believe me. So, take some time and look for yourself. If you're really interested that is.

[Wizzard]

There once was a man that loved and forgave his enemies.

(font=sarcasm) But He has returned, and his name is Barack Hussein Obama! (/font)

I thought Wizzard was referencing Jesus ?  You haven't finally seen the error of your ways ? 

Meathead got it right. I was.

[Valkorado]

There once was a man that loved and forgave his enemies.

(font=sarcasm) But He has returned, and his name is Barack Hussein Obama! (/font)

I thought Wizzard was referencing Jesus ?   You haven't finally seen the error of your ways ?  

Meathead got it right. I was.

Didn't think I'd have to explain this one, sarcasm font must be broken.   I was saying Barack's followers seem to think he is the savior.  He does seem to love our enemies, but I sincerely doubt for Christion reasons.  

[baldo]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

Its interesting to look into her background and how it relates to the obamas and other obama staffers.

That's quite a teaser......how about some details?

One more time. You're not about to believe me. So, take some time and look for yourself. If you're really interested that is.

Typical......just throw any BS out there and see if it sticks.

Sorry my friend, you made the claim, back it up.

[Serk]

[Pete]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

Liberal claims are fact, all others facts are claims.

You must prove you facts, liberals can just state theirs and if you ask meaningful questions they can ignore them.

Liberals are lazy and will not research anything as it might interfere with their mind that is made up.

Also if a liberal can redirect you into doing the research, you waste time and the liberal can then ignore your references and belittle them.

Liberals are all about feelings and facts interfere with feelings, so facts are bad.

Liberal reading and hearing ability is restricted to what they already believe and anything that conflicts with that is filtered out as hear say.

After all liberals have the ability to deny reality, real facts included.

Literal dogma is group think, individualism and reality must never be allowed to intrude.
"If it saves one life it is worth it" never mind that it also results in the murder of hundreds.

Liberals live in fantasy land, and it may be best if they are left there. There survival in a real world is doubtful, because of a flawed liberal decision process.

Liberals lack the self reliant gene and therefore typically require government supervision and government  bias to marginally succeed, (read exist).

Liberal does not really mean that they are liberal as they are typically socialist repressionist intent on controlling others lives, money and freedoms.

A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

[baldo]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

Liberal claims are fact, all others facts are claims.

You must prove you facts, liberals can just state theirs and if you ask meaningful questions they can ignore them.

Liberals are lazy and will not research anything as it might interfere with their mind that is made up.

Also if a liberal can redirect you into doing the research, you waste time and the liberal can then ignore your references and belittle them.

Liberals are all about feelings and facts interfere with feelings, so facts are bad.

Liberal reading and hearing ability is restricted to what they already believe and anything that conflicts with that is filtered out as hear say.

After all liberals have the ability to deny reality, real facts included.

Literal dogma is group think, individualism and reality must never be allowed to intrude.
"If it saves one life it is worth it" never mind that it also results in the murder of hundreds.

Liberals live in fantasy land, and it may be best if they are left there. There survival in a real world is doubtful, because of a flawed liberal decision process.

Liberals lack the self reliant gene and therefore typically require government supervision and government  bias to marginally succeed, (read exist).

Liberal does not really mean that they are liberal as they are typically socialist repressionist intent on controlling others lives, money and freedoms.

A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

Pete,

How long did it take to make all this up? Did it come to you in a dream?

[3fan4life]

Yep, that needs to be our response to terrorism.

Wow, barely 6 AM and you're posting about terrorists....

Is that before or after morning coffee?

So I take this to mean that you support terrorism and are in favor of their terrorist activities.

Sounds to me like you belong on a terrorist watch list.

[baldo]

Yep, that needs to be our response to terrorism.

Wow, barely 6 AM and you're posting about terrorists....

Is that before or after morning coffee?

So I take this to mean that you support terrorism and are in favor of their terrorist activities.

Sounds to me like you belong on a terrorist watch list.

LOL...WOW, that's quite a leap you just took. Have you ever qualified for the Olympics?

[Serk]

Emotions are raw, tempers are flaring...

I'm no angel in this regard, but can we please stick to attacking ideas and not each other?

[baldo]

Emotions are raw, tempers are flaring...

I'm no angel in this regard, but can we please stick to attacking ideas and not each other?

You're right...it does seem to be a bit tense around here the last few days. It seems once Inzane was behind us, the fangs started showing again...

I don't like it...I'm a lover, not a fighter.....

[Patrick]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

Its interesting to look into her background and how it relates to the obamas and other obama staffers.

That's quite a teaser......how about some details?

One more time. You're not about to believe me. So, take some time and look for yourself. If you're really interested that is.

Typical......just throw any BS out there and see if it sticks.

Sorry my friend, you made the claim, back it up.

It can be backed up, just go and look. Why should anyone, including myself, spend any more time knowing from history that your're not going to read or believe any of what anyone would do or say.
You've pulled this same crap before, I ain't falling for it again.

[baldo]

Some of Lynch's closest family and friends are terrorist sympathizers.

Its interesting to look into her background and how it relates to the obamas and other obama staffers.

That's quite a teaser......how about some details?

One more time. You're not about to believe me. So, take some time and look for yourself. If you're really interested that is.

Typical......just throw any BS out there and see if it sticks.

Sorry my friend, you made the claim, back it up.

It can be backed up, just go and look. Why should anyone, including myself, spend any more time knowing from history that your're not going to read or believe any of what anyone would do or say.
You've pulled this same crap before, I ain't falling for it again.

Patrick, I could say the exact same thing. You could tell me the earth is flat, prove me wrong. I've said it before, I'm not going to waste my time on BS searches for nothing.

I'll always read and consider an alternate theory/idea/etc, with one caveat. It has to be a reputable source. No assholes like Alex Jones, Beck etc.

If you're confident in a post, show it. If not, maybe it's best to keep it to yourself.

[3fan4life]

Yep, that needs to be our response to terrorism.

Wow, barely 6 AM and you're posting about terrorists....

Is that before or after morning coffee?

So I take this to mean that you support terrorism and are in favor of their terrorist activities.

Sounds to me like you belong on a terrorist watch list.

LOL...WOW, that's quite a leap you just took. Have you ever qualified for the Olympics?

Not a leap at all.

You were against someone posting something negative about terrorism.

So therefore you must be for terrorism.


It's the same thing as Muslims that won't speak out against terrorism.

They may not be terrorist themselves but their lack of outrage at the terrorist's activities implies complicity.

If you're not against something then. You must be for it.

[Pete]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

.....................................................
A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

Pete,

How long did it take to make all this up? Did it come to you in a dream?

Since it does not agree with someones "facts" it must be made up or dreamed? Typical!
Thanks for helping proving and re-enforcing the point.

Known for years  by millions of folks, all it takes is some intelligence, some observation, some research and a simple  correlation of those.

It is not rocket science to a non liberal progressive but much akin to magic for the committed liberal.

[Romeo]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

Liberal claims are fact, all others facts are claims.

You must prove you facts, liberals can just state theirs and if you ask meaningful questions they can ignore them.

Liberals are lazy and will not research anything as it might interfere with their mind that is made up.

Also if a liberal can redirect you into doing the research, you waste time and the liberal can then ignore your references and belittle them.

Liberals are all about feelings and facts interfere with feelings, so facts are bad.

Liberal reading and hearing ability is restricted to what they already believe and anything that conflicts with that is filtered out as hear say.

After all liberals have the ability to deny reality, real facts included.

Literal dogma is group think, individualism and reality must never be allowed to intrude.
"If it saves one life it is worth it" never mind that it also results in the murder of hundreds.

Liberals live in fantasy land, and it may be best if they are left there. There survival in a real world is doubtful, because of a flawed liberal decision process.

Liberals lack the self reliant gene and therefore typically require government supervision and government  bias to marginally succeed, (read exist).

Liberal does not really mean that they are liberal as they are typically socialist repressionist intent on controlling others lives, money and freedoms.

A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

so true.

[baldo]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

.....................................................
A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

Pete,

How long did it take to make all this up? Did it come to you in a dream?

Since it does not agree with someones "facts" it must be made up or dreamed? Typical!
Thanks for helping proving and re-enforcing the point.

Known for years  by millions of folks, all it takes is some intelligence, some observation, some research and a simple  correlation of those.

It is not rocket science to a non liberal progressive but much akin to magic for the committed liberal.

The funniest part about that list is that I could change the word liberal to conservative, and in every instance it would make sense.

And 'known for years, by millions of folks' ?

It's like Fox with their lead in to just about every BS story they put out...."Some people say".  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYA9ufivbDw

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kathleen-reardon/the-high-political-price_b_1015843.html

Now, do you see what I did there? I backed up a claim with a source. I didn't pull it out of my butt, I didn't dream it up, I backed it up with a source. I don't know why that's so hard.

[Romeo]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

Liberal claims are fact, all others facts are claims.

You must prove you facts, liberals can just state theirs and if you ask meaningful questions they can ignore them.

Liberals are lazy and will not research anything as it might interfere with their mind that is made up.

Also if a liberal can redirect you into doing the research, you waste time and the liberal can then ignore your references and belittle them.

Liberals are all about feelings and facts interfere with feelings, so facts are bad.

Liberal reading and hearing ability is restricted to what they already believe and anything that conflicts with that is filtered out as hear say.

After all liberals have the ability to deny reality, real facts included.

Literal dogma is group think, individualism and reality must never be allowed to intrude.
"If it saves one life it is worth it" never mind that it also results in the murder of hundreds.

Liberals live in fantasy land, and it may be best if they are left there. There survival in a real world is doubtful, because of a flawed liberal decision process.

Liberals lack the self reliant gene and therefore typically require government supervision and government  bias to marginally succeed, (read exist).

Liberal does not really mean that they are liberal as they are typically socialist repressionist intent on controlling others lives, money and freedoms.

A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

so true.

[Patrick]

If not, maybe it's best to keep it to yourself.
end quote






I sure wish you would.

[Psychotic Bovine]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

.....................................................
A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

Pete,

How long did it take to make all this up? Did it come to you in a dream?

Since it does not agree with someones "facts" it must be made up or dreamed? Typical!
Thanks for helping proving and re-enforcing the point.

Known for years  by millions of folks, all it takes is some intelligence, some observation, some research and a simple  correlation of those.

It is not rocket science to a non liberal progressive but much akin to magic for the committed liberal.

The funniest part about that list is that I could change the word liberal to conservative, and in every instance it would make sense.

And 'known for years, by millions of folks' ?

It's like Fox with their lead in to just about every BS story they put out...."Some people say".  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYA9ufivbDw

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kathleen-reardon/the-high-political-price_b_1015843.html

Now, do you see what I did there? I backed up a claim with a source. I didn't pull it out of my butt, I didn't dream it up, I backed it up with a source. I don't know why that's so hard.

An op ed is not a source. And the Huffington Post is hardly a journalistic source, anyway.

I wasn't going to post this piece about the Lynch/terrorist connection, since it's not a reputable source, but if you can post an opinion piece from the Huff and Puff Post, then I guess this is ok.

http://gotnews.com/loretta-lynch-belonged-jew-hating-pro-terrorist-harvard-group/

[Jess from VA]

Emotions are raw, tempers are flaring...

I'm no angel in this regard, but can we please stick to attacking ideas and not each other?

Very much agree.  Some of my posts are fairly sharp edged, but are not aimed at other posters.  Maybe their ideas or assertions, but not at them personally.   This goes both ways.

Poor:  Jane, you ignorant slut.....

Better:  Jane, how can you say or believe such a thing?  Your head is buried in the sand.  Here is what I think......

Best:   Jane, I disagree with your position because........... (facts and argument)

Put your energy and passion in your logical argument(s), not your disbelief or anger at your opponent's blockheadedness.  (Again, this goes both ways)

[baldo]

If any of this sounds familiar you may understand a liberal progressive.

.....................................................
A true liberal would be freedoms greatest asset, a current liberal progressive is freedoms greatest enemy.

Their label (liberal) is a lie, and somehow that seems appropriate.

Pete,

How long did it take to make all this up? Did it come to you in a dream?

Since it does not agree with someones "facts" it must be made up or dreamed? Typical!
Thanks for helping proving and re-enforcing the point.

Known for years  by millions of folks, all it takes is some intelligence, some observation, some research and a simple  correlation of those.

It is not rocket science to a non liberal progressive but much akin to magic for the committed liberal.

The funniest part about that list is that I could change the word liberal to conservative, and in every instance it would make sense.

And 'known for years, by millions of folks' ?

It's like Fox with their lead in to just about every BS story they put out...."Some people say".  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYA9ufivbDw

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kathleen-reardon/the-high-political-price_b_1015843.html

Now, do you see what I did there? I backed up a claim with a source. I didn't pull it out of my butt, I didn't dream it up, I backed it up with a source. I don't know why that's so hard.

An op ed is not a source. And the Huffington Post is hardly a journalistic source, anyway.

I wasn't going to post this piece about the Lynch/terrorist connection, since it's not a reputable source, but if you can post an opinion piece from the Huff and Puff Post, then I guess this is ok.

http://gotnews.com/loretta-lynch-belonged-jew-hating-pro-terrorist-harvard-group/

I noticed you deleted your earlier post.

And sorry, but those two links were the only ones that fit my narrow-minded, myopic agenda, so I went for it....

[Psychotic Bovine]

Which post was that?

Come to think of it, never mind.  I delete posts for any number of reasons.  If you want to keep track, more power to you.

[baldo]

Which post was that?

Come to think of it, never mind.  I delete posts for any number of reasons.  If you want to keep track, more power to you.

Keep track? Sorry, you give me too much credit. It was something ridiculous, which you just referenced.  

Actually, it was something even more outlandish.

Have a nice day.