When will he hit bottom?

[baldo]

Every day seems to bring a new low to light. Mr trump has been a very bad boy and it's starting to catch up with him....

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article105849807.html

[Wizzard]

Well, I guess if he is afforded the same pass that Hildabeast has had then nothing will happen. Not sure how reliable your source is though.   Especially given this.

On August 4, 2013, McClatchy Newspapers, citing anonymous sources, reported on conversations between Ayman al-Zawahri, who succeeded Osama bin Laden as the head of Al Qaeda, and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the head of the Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, discussing an alleged imminent terrorist attack. Two days previously, The New York Times had agreed to withhold the identities of the Al Qaeda leaders after US intelligence officials claimed the information could jeopardize their operations. Government analysts and officials interviewed by the Times said the impact of this disclosure caused more immediate damage to American counterterrorism efforts than the thousands of classified documents disclosed by Edward Snowden due to a sharp drop in the terrorists' use of a major communications channel that the authorities were monitoring.[10] Subsequently, officials have been searching for new ways to monitor communications among Al Qaeda's leaders and operatives.[10]

[baldo]

Well, I guess if he is afforded the same pass that Hildabeast has had then nothing will happen. Not sure how reliable your source is though.   Especially given this.

On August 4, 2013, McClatchy Newspapers, citing anonymous sources, reported on conversations between Ayman al-Zawahri, who succeeded Osama bin Laden as the head of Al Qaeda, and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the head of the Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, discussing an alleged imminent terrorist attack. Two days previously, The New York Times had agreed to withhold the identities of the Al Qaeda leaders after US intelligence officials claimed the information could jeopardize their operations. Government analysts and officials interviewed by the Times said the impact of this disclosure caused more immediate damage to American counterterrorism efforts than the thousands of classified documents disclosed by Edward Snowden due to a sharp drop in the terrorists' use of a major communications channel that the authorities were monitoring.[10] Subsequently, officials have been searching for new ways to monitor communications among Al Qaeda's leaders and operatives.[10]

There are other sources. That's the only one I used. And what does your cut-and-paste have to do with the OP?

[3fan4life]

He can sink as low as the Marianas Trench and still not be as low as Hillary is.

And I too would question your source.

It's funny how left leaning people always question sources when you don't agree with what they are saying.

But, if it promotes their agenda it is ALWAYS reputable.

[baldo]

He can sink as low as the Marianas Trench and still not be as low as Hillary is.

And I too would question your source.

It's funny how left leaning people always question sources when you don't agree with what they are saying.

But, if it promotes their agenda it is ALWAYS reputable.

Lol...I wasn't questioning his source. I was questioning what it had to do with the thread at hand.

Classic deflection.

Here's a cornucopia of links regarding his antics....

https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+using+foundation+for+campaign&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Pull up a chair and grab a beer. It'll take a while to read them all.

[Wizzard]

Well, I guess if he is afforded the same pass that Hildabeast has had then nothing will happen. Not sure how reliable your source is though.   Especially given this.

On August 4, 2013, McClatchy Newspapers, citing anonymous sources, reported on conversations between Ayman al-Zawahri, who succeeded Osama bin Laden as the head of Al Qaeda, and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the head of the Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, discussing an alleged imminent terrorist attack. Two days previously, The New York Times had agreed to withhold the identities of the Al Qaeda leaders after US intelligence officials claimed the information could jeopardize their operations. Government analysts and officials interviewed by the Times said the impact of this disclosure caused more immediate damage to American counterterrorism efforts than the thousands of classified documents disclosed by Edward Snowden due to a sharp drop in the terrorists' use of a major communications channel that the authorities were monitoring.[10] Subsequently, officials have been searching for new ways to monitor communications among Al Qaeda's leaders and operatives.[10]

There are other sources. That's the only one I used. And what does your cut-and-paste have to do with the OP?

It has to do with the credibility of your source. Like you always like to make note of.  

And there is not enough beer in the world to supply me whilst I read this kind of stuff about Hildabeast

[baldo]

Well, I guess if he is afforded the same pass that Hildabeast has had then nothing will happen. Not sure how reliable your source is though.   Especially given this.

On August 4, 2013, McClatchy Newspapers, citing anonymous sources, reported on conversations between Ayman al-Zawahri, who succeeded Osama bin Laden as the head of Al Qaeda, and Nasser al-Wuhayshi, the head of the Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, discussing an alleged imminent terrorist attack. Two days previously, The New York Times had agreed to withhold the identities of the Al Qaeda leaders after US intelligence officials claimed the information could jeopardize their operations. Government analysts and officials interviewed by the Times said the impact of this disclosure caused more immediate damage to American counterterrorism efforts than the thousands of classified documents disclosed by Edward Snowden due to a sharp drop in the terrorists' use of a major communications channel that the authorities were monitoring.[10] Subsequently, officials have been searching for new ways to monitor communications among Al Qaeda's leaders and operatives.[10]

There are other sources. That's the only one I used. And what does your cut-and-paste have to do with the OP?

It has to do with the credibility of your source. Like you always like to make note of. 

Don't like that one? See previous comment. Like I said, that was only the first one.

[3fan4life]

He can sink as low as the Marianas Trench and still not be as low as Hillary is.

And I too would question your source.

It's funny how left leaning people always question sources when you don't agree with what they are saying.

But, if it promotes their agenda it is ALWAYS reputable.

Lol...I wasn't questioning his source. I was questioning what it had to do with the thread at hand.

Classic deflection.

Here's a cornucopia of links regarding his antics....

https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+using+foundation+for+campaign&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

Pull up a chair and grab a beer. It'll take a while to read them all.

I wasn't referring to anonther's post or source, I was referring to yours.


I seriously doubt that Trump is "Squeaky" clean.

I am EQUALLY sure that he dosen't have the skeletons in his closet or the body count that Hillary has.

[NewValker]

Hey Bob, done any riding lately?
Sure wish I could...
Craig

[baldo]

Hey Bob, done any riding lately?
Sure wish I could...
Craig

Lol......don't try and distract me, Craig...

Not at all, but Friday will change that. Too bad you aren't going to make it. I hope you're mending well....

[solo1]

I see that you're still up to the formidable task to try to change the views here.

Why don't you go for a nice ride.  It's more productive.

[baldo]

I see that you're still up to the formidable task to try to change the views here.

Why don't you go for a nice ride.  It's more productive.

Lol....what can I say, Wayne.

I welcome the challenge....

[..]

One day you're whining  about political posts and the next you're doing it.

Talk about nuts.

[baldo]

One day you're whining  about political posts and the next you're doing it.

Talk about nuts.

Pal, you know what you can do with your whine.

Don't you have a link to post or something?

[f6john]

Trump must have really pissed in your Cherrios for you to have such a hard on for him. I don't read links, if you have some facts to share, spill the beans, otherwise your just wasting your time.

[Jess from VA]

    
When will he hit bottom?

You offering yours?   

[The emperor has no clothes]

Bob, I believe your premise is flawed. There must be a bottom in order to hit it.

[Psychotic Bovine]

"Observation:

Of the 19 active threads on page 1, four of them are bike related.

Just sayin'." - Baldo

This is pretty funny, since you were just complaining about non-bike threads a couple of days ago.

I would guess, without even checking, that you have posted in nearly ALL political threads in the last month.  And I bet you don't even see the irony.

[Gavin_Sons]

I guess since Pence owned Kaine last night he was upset and had to dig up some false info. 
Baldo also likes stirring the pot then complaining about political threads then starting one 

[Gavin_Sons]

Also, I'm 100% certain Hildabitch has used the Clinton foundation for personal financial gain.  

[fudgie]

I guess as long Trumps has not let anyone die im ok with him. 

[baldo]

Also, I'm 100% certain Hildabitch has used the Clinton foundation for personal financial gain.  

Hey, my friend Galvin is back! Like meathead said, please put me back on your ignore list....

[baldo]

"Observation:

Of the 19 active threads on page 1, four of them are bike related.

Just sayin'." - Baldo

This is pretty funny, since you were just complaining about non-bike threads a couple of days ago.

I would guess, without even checking, that you have posted in nearly ALL political threads in the last month.  And I bet you don't even see the irony.

I challenge you to count em up. I wager you'll be wrong...

And let me correct you. That wasn't a complaint, it was an observation. Take a few minutes and review the posts. 

[baldo]

   
When will he hit bottom?

You offering yours?   

Sorry, mine is spoken for....

[baldo]

Trump must have really pissed in your Cherrios for you to have such a hard on for him. I don't read links, if you have some facts to share, spill the beans, otherwise your just wasting your time.

And lastly....no, my disdain for Trump isn't new. Take a look back, you'll find my feelings toward him are pretty constant. I just haven't gotten to the point of wishing him harm as some here have toward Clinton.

[baldo]

Also, I'm 100% certain Hildabitch has used the Clinton foundation for personal financial gain.  

Hey, my friend Galvin is back! Like meathead said, please put me back on your ignore list....

Don't worry, you're still there. Just had to pop in and let you know I still think you're an asshat. 

Watch out friend. Dancing awfully close to violating those old rules. And name-calling? I'm shocked...

[Gavin_Sons]

Also, I'm 100% certain Hildabitch has used the Clinton foundation for personal financial gain.  

Hey, my friend Galvin is back! Like meathead said, please put me back on your ignore list....

Don't worry, you're still there. Just had to pop in and let you know I still think you're an asshat. 

Watch out friend. Dancing awfully close to violating those old rules. And name-calling? I'm shocked...

I didn't call you an asshat, just said I think you are. Whether you are or not is up to someone that knows you on a personal level.

[Alberta Patriot]

Okay...when are you guys going to learn..."hit the ignore switch"...trolls have no reason to exist if you don't feed them.

[RDAbull]

When--- Right after he wins the election.
He will have to move into public housing.

[Gavin_Sons]

Okay...when are you guys going to learn..."hit the ignore switch"...trolls have no reason to exist if you don't feed them.

This one must be a hybrid troll. 

[Alberta Patriot]

Okay...when are you guys going to learn..."hit the ignore switch"...trolls have no reason to exist if you don't feed them.

This one must be a hybrid troll.  

Took me a minute ???...Switch....Troll   

[Robert]

Real Clear Politics tracked a series of donations Trump made through his foundation between 2011 and 2014 totaling at least $286,000 to right-leaning policy groups. The analysis found that timing of the donations lined up with endorsements from such groups or speaking invitations at conferences and events. These engagements gave him a stage and access to the voters he would later hope to court during his unconventional presidential campaign.

Trump officially announced he was running for the White House in June 2015, but appears to have had his eye on the presidency years before.

That above is a paragraph from the article you posted **

So let me break this down, Trump,    paid,   right leaning policy groups to  offer him    a speaking engagement when he was    not even in the presidential race to attain notoriety.

The mind Police said he obviously knew he was going to run so its a problem.  

Really, I mean really, are you kidding?

So lets say he knew he was going to run for arguments sake,

So he paid for a speaking engagement and the only thing he received was notoriety.

Well lets see and do a comparison,

Hillary gave State secrets and State favors to have Bill or herself speak at engagements and those groups paid Hillary or Bill to speak making payments or donations to the Clinton foundation.

She paid with state secrets and time and favors and reaped the reward of money while she was in or working for the State Department.

Sure doesn't sound the same to me, in fact that has to be the stupidest article and charges I have ever seen. 

[f6john]

Trump must have really pissed in your Cherrios for you to have such a hard on for him. I don't read links, if you have some facts to share, spill the beans, otherwise your just wasting your time.

And lastly....no, my disdain for Trump isn't new. Take a look back, you'll find my feelings toward him are pretty constant. I just haven't gotten to the point of wishing him harm as some here have toward Clinton.

    I understand, he pissed in your Cherrios a long time ago and you just can't let it go. And you know no one here wishes her physical harm in the real sense of the the meaning. I have obsessed over the election too much this summer and then a close family member died way too soon at 54 and once again things got put into perspective for me. I'll vote for Trump  and the outcome will be what it is.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Trump must have really pissed in your Cherrios for you to have such a hard on for him. I don't read links, if you have some facts to share, spill the beans, otherwise your just wasting your time.

And lastly....no, my disdain for Trump isn't new. Take a look back, you'll find my feelings toward him are pretty constant. I just haven't gotten to the point of wishing him harm as some here have toward Clinton.

    I understand, he pissed in your Cherrios a long time ago and you just can't let it go. And you know no one here wishes her physical harm in the real sense of the the meaning. I have obsessed over the election too much this summer and then a close family member died way too soon at 54 and once again things got put into perspective for me. I'll vote for Trump  and the outcome will be what it is.

54 is way too young. I'm sorry to hear that John.

[Pappy!]

How low is Hillary?
Well....if  snake would fart it would blow sand in her face !

[Jersey mike]

Every day seems to bring a new low to light. Mr trump has been a very bad boy and it's starting to catch up with him....

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article105849807.html

You talk about DT having bad days and new "lows", HC has been setting new lows for decades.

If lows were a number line HC would be so far into negative numbers she could do everything "right" for the rest of her life and still not get back to zero.


What makes HC such an appealing candidate?

Her career as an honorable politician?

Her trust worthiness?

Her acute knack in decision making?

Her acceptance of personal responsibility?

Her profound ability to forget important things except when it comes to everything in her books?

I'm really interested in knowing how someone can be so pro Clinton in this election, because I haven't met anyone that says they are voting for her, maybe they're too ashamed to admit it publicly.

[Rams]

When will he hit bottom?

I'm very thankful someone determined this was a political thread.

At first, I thought it was a thread about Bill Clinton and his adventures with Monica.

Which is something I do not care to discuss or know anything further about.    

[..]

One day you're whining  about political posts and the next you're doing it.

Talk about nuts.

Pal, you know what you can do with your whine.

Don't you have a link to post or something?

Please describe how my post is factually wrong.

You complained about political posts and then create one yourself.

Schizophrenia is a sign of being mentally unstable ie nuts.

Following is a post. You suggested I do one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia

[Gavin_Sons]

Seems to me Billy has been trying to hit the bottom of something or anything for years.



http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/re-surfaced-sex-allegation-could-be-hillary-clintons-biggest-nightmare/

[baldo]

Every day seems to bring a new low to light. Mr trump has been a very bad boy and it's starting to catch up with him....

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article105849807.html

You talk about DT having bad days and new "lows", HC has been setting new lows for decades.

If lows were a number line HC would be so far into negative numbers she could do everything "right" for the rest of her life and still not get back to zero.


What makes HC such an appealing candidate?

Her career as an honorable politician?

Her trust worthiness?

Her acute knack in decision making?

Her acceptance of personal responsibility?

Her profound ability to forget important things except when it comes to everything in her books?

I'm really interested in knowing how someone can be so pro Clinton in this election, because I haven't met anyone that says they are voting for her, maybe they're too ashamed to admit it publicly.

Mike,

Again, I've said this many times. I'm not a Hillary fan. But, she'll get my vote for one big reason.

She's not Trump.